AstroClassifieds.com  

Go Back   AstroClassifieds.com > Astro-Imaging CCD & Film Based > Novice Imager

Novice Imager Ask your questions about the amazing field of imaging

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-23-2006, 03:17 PM
KenMiller's Avatar
KenMiller KenMiller is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lakeland, FL
Posts: 247
Send a message via MSN to KenMiller
Question Is This Overexposed???

One of these is a 5 min. exposure through a Tak E-180 with a Canon Digital Rebel XTi and the other is a 2 min. exposure.

Is the 5 min. exposure overexposed?

When I combine 5 min. exposures, a large portion of the center is all white.

I'm guessing I need to use the shorter exposures?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_0002.1024x683.JPG (252.4 KB, 40 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0005.1024x683JPG.JPG (254.4 KB, 42 views)
__________________
Ken Miller
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-24-2006, 12:39 AM
neilfleming neilfleming is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 246
Default

It depends on how the initial processing was done. These were also NOT full sized, right?

Here is a quick run through Photoshop. Gradient removal was done this way:
http://www.flemingastrophotography.com/gradients.html

I did that for both the 5 and 2-minute exposures, then I layered in the core of M31 from the 2-minute exposure like this:
http://www.astropix.com/HTML/J_DIGIT/LAYMASK.HTM

Here is the result:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg M31.jpg (387.6 KB, 50 views)
__________________
www.flemingastrophotography.com
Direct from Boston - Brilliant diamonds in pea soup
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-24-2006, 01:05 PM
KenMiller's Avatar
KenMiller KenMiller is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lakeland, FL
Posts: 247
Send a message via MSN to KenMiller
Default

That is... amazing. Thanks for showing me what's possible. I guess I should get serious about using Photoshop. Until now I've mostly used MaxDSLR.

I attached a copy of the best I could do with 6 original images. There's obviously a lot more I can get out of them

The only processing on those images was to scale them to a size that would be uploadable to the forum - nothing else. So no, they weren't full size.

Thanks for posting the links too Neil.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_00XX.jpg (128.6 KB, 34 views)
__________________
Ken Miller
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-25-2006, 02:38 PM
KenMiller's Avatar
KenMiller KenMiller is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lakeland, FL
Posts: 247
Send a message via MSN to KenMiller
Default

I am trying to walk through each of the links you provided.

Quote:
Originally Posted by neilfleming View Post
Here is a quick run through Photoshop. Gradient removal was done this way:
http://www.flemingastrophotography.com/gradients.html
  1. Duplicate your image into a separate document, then flatten it.
What do you mean by "flatten it?" I've looked in the PhotoShop help but the context in which they discussing flattening doesn't seem appropriate.
__________________
Ken Miller
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-25-2006, 08:10 PM
neilfleming neilfleming is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 246
Default

You will see that option under the Layers menu if you have more than one layer in your photoshop document. SHIFT+CTL+E is the keyboard shortcut.

...Neil
__________________
www.flemingastrophotography.com
Direct from Boston - Brilliant diamonds in pea soup
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-26-2006, 04:16 PM
KenMiller's Avatar
KenMiller KenMiller is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lakeland, FL
Posts: 247
Send a message via MSN to KenMiller
Default

Using the techniques described in the links you provided I was able to improve to the point of the attached image.

Did you do anything else Neil or do I just need that much more practice?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg M31CompositeResized.jpg (148.0 KB, 33 views)
__________________
Ken Miller
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-26-2006, 05:23 PM
neilfleming neilfleming is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 246
Default

You're certainly getting there, Ken. You will find that your processing skills with grow over time. I know mine certainly have, and I started out with a good knowlege of PS.

...Neil
__________________
www.flemingastrophotography.com
Direct from Boston - Brilliant diamonds in pea soup
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-26-2006, 05:26 PM
KenMiller's Avatar
KenMiller KenMiller is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lakeland, FL
Posts: 247
Send a message via MSN to KenMiller
Default

Thanks Neil. From what I've seen so far, I'm going to be spending a lot of time learning PS and a lot of time putting together a machine shop in order to fabricate the parts necessary to make the optics do what I need them to
__________________
Ken Miller
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-26-2006, 09:37 PM
BT Technologies's Avatar
BT Technologies BT Technologies is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Miami, FL USA
Posts: 523
Default

That is REALLY impressive Neil.. Isn't the software that is available to us simply incredible in what we can do with it?


Quote:
Originally Posted by neilfleming View Post
It depends on how the initial processing was done. These were also NOT full sized, right?

Here is a quick run through Photoshop. Gradient removal was done this way:
http://www.flemingastrophotography.com/gradients.html

I did that for both the 5 and 2-minute exposures, then I layered in the core of M31 from the 2-minute exposure like this:
http://www.astropix.com/HTML/J_DIGIT/LAYMASK.HTM

Here is the result:
__________________
Thanks!!

Brian
BT Technologies, Inc
305.652.3115
email: info@bttechnologies.com
http://www.bttechnologies.com
http://www.astroclassifieds.com
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-23-2007, 07:31 PM
mdine1us mdine1us is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 9
Default Re: Is This Overexposed???

Impressive?! Heck that's downright HUMILIATING! I just keep staring at the thing. It's really beautiful!

Nicely done Neil, and Ken for getting the data! That's alot of good data in those two exposures...

Regards,
Marty
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79